KSF-ERIC
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2019
- Messages
- 8,659
- Likes
- 6,453
- Points
- 113
4 or 5 times; we ran it on our podcast and got 1Then you have not run it much.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
4 or 5 times; we ran it on our podcast and got 1Then you have not run it much.
If The Blazers pick is 4 or later and Chet is available? They better take him. What are you thinking?
Never mind? Chet is going 1, 2, or 3. Even if the Blazers get one of those picks they might take him. If they get 3 and he's there they will take him.
Bet on it.
Dame is finally the MVP of something... aside from being #1 in our hearts!
Didn't Dame win the "MVP of 'The Bubble'"?
I know he shoulda won it at the AS game a couple years ago.
I would take Kirilenko #1 overall in todays NBA, that dude was ahead of his time.
We are getting the 7th pick. You can play that simulator hundreds of times and #7 comes up the most and continues to come up. The more you play the more it becomes obvious 7th pick is in the cards.
The fact is that we have a better chance of ending up in the top 4 than we do of ending up at 7 specifically. Obviously of all of the specific destinations 7 is the most likely but we're talking about less than a 30% chance so I wouldn't bet the house on us ending up there. The problem is that 8 is the second most likely destination for us and the two together (7 and 8) are a 50.3% chance so it's more likely than not that we end up in one of those two spots. What's cool is that we had less than a 6% chance to land the number one pick in 2007 and we have a 9% chance of landing there in a little more than an hour.
If you could swap any possible lottery pick and instead take the 5th pick would you do it?
Give up any possibility of getting the 1, 2, 3 or 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 and take the #5 instead?
I think there's a lot more to it. If Cronin has a way to add more talent than just that top pick then you're right it's just about picking the right guy but it might end up being about moving back to a spot where we can still draft an impact starter and use whatever we get when trading back to pick up another starter.Then we just need to pick the correct guy which is Banchero or Smith. Period.
The smart answer would be yes and I'm glad it's not an option because I wouldn't do the smart thing. I'd want that 9% chance to get the first pick and 37.2% chance to move up higher than 5.If you could swap any possible lottery pick and instead take the 5th pick would you do it?
Give up any possibility of getting the 1, 2, 3 or 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 and take the #5 instead?
We have a 62% chance of ending up with a pick higher than #5.
What about for the #4 pick instead of #5?
Isn't that the Lakers pick?NOP better not get the 1st
Isn't that the Lakers pick?
I would enjoy that.
I wouldn't because then they would have screwed us out a pick and then also got the first. Fuck that.
I guess I'm reading your statement wrong. Sure i'm certain you can get a top 3 out of running this simulation a number of times.4 or 5 times; we ran it on our podcast and got 1
they wouldn't have traded that pick without top-4 protection
I'm coming up with exactly the way i said I'm coming up with it.we have a 30% chance of getting the number 7 pick and a 70% chance of not getting the number 7 pick so I am not sure how you come to that conclusion.