Mr. Robot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2017
- Messages
- 4,482
- Likes
- 4,114
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I gave you a bunch of stats which prove that DeAndre is declining, and you had no response. Now do you want to participate in logical argument instead of acting like a douche? Because I'm not going to entertain both.Let me get this straight... you think DeAndre Jordan, who leads the league in rebounding and fg % this year, and was all nba first team 2 seasons ago is over the hill at 29... but you want to give up a 1st rd pick for undersized 32 year old Wes Matthews who gets paid more than Turner.... hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!
I would not give up a 1st for Matthews. No. They are asking for a 1st for him and they haven't gotten it (and won't imo) yet. As I said, a 2nd sure.We don't have to retrade him, I'd rather keep him for his last year and solve our tax issues in other ways. Keep him for his last year as an upgrade to our rotation which would make us much better. However, if we had to, we could retrade him and likely receive a 2nd round pick or two. That would essentially be the same as trading Turner and a 1st now and getting back a one or two second round picks. How is that a bad option? You wouldn't do that?
This dude wants to give up Nurkic AND picks for DeAndre, who's expiring, declining, and will command $25M over 3 years at least. And then he tries to act like his opinion is superior. LMAO.
I understand why not, I believe we'd gain more flexibility and more of an upgrade than you or Gronk does. Thinking about it harder, I'd probably want their 2nd (which is around 33 right now). Moving down 13 picks in the draft to swap those two out is definitely worth it.I would not give up a 1st for Matthews. No. They are asking for a 1st for him and they haven't gotten it (and won't imo) yet. As I said, a 2nd sure.
Agree with you on DeAndre part.I understand why not, I believe we'd gain more flexibility and more of an upgrade than you or Gronk does. Thinking about it harder, I'd probably want their 2nd (which is around 33 right now). Moving down 13 picks in the draft to swap those two out is definitely worth it.
Still no way I'd ever want to even swap Nurkic for DeAndre straight up. That shits ridiculous.
That's what I don't understand. I understand not wanting to do that Matthews deal and we can have a discussion about it. But this man has some nerve. I've been polite to this dude given how rude he's been.Agree with you on DeAndre part.
in all honesty, I found it hilarious that you two are arguing about whos right when youre both wrong, both trades proposed by two of you are bad... fuck it, not even SAC would do any of those dealsThis dude wants to give up Nurkic AND picks for DeAndre, who's expiring, declining, and will command $25M over 3 years at least. And then he tries to act like his opinion is superior. LMAO.
Lmao. Which would you rather do?in all honesty, I found it hilarious that you two are arguing about whos right when youre both wrong, both trades proposed by two of you are bad... fuck it, not even SAC would do any of those deals
neither one, Id rather stick with ETLmao. Which would you rather do?
No it won't. The only thing that could help the fast break is a new coach or a new PG...and it might take both in order for us to be successful on the break.
So was Oden, Bowie, etc
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bl...eadline-deandre-jordan-trail-blazers-clippers
Trail Blazers, DeAndre Jordan Connected Ahead of NBA Trade Deadline
Brian Windhorst says, “I think he’s either in L.A. or Portland”.
This one belongs here: http://www.sportstwo.com/threads/crazy-trade-ideas.323880/View attachment 18386
Plus our first.
Evidently Orlando isn’t sold on Payton so Napier could be of interest. They also get a look at Vonleh. Aminu fits the type of athletes their front office looks for and is on a tradeable contract if they wanted to move him. So for Orlando it’s a minimum commitment financially.
We get Gordon and dump Afflalo. Mack can replace Napier. Financially, Aminu, Vonleh and Napier should combine to make about what Gordon will get in FA.
Dame
CJ
Turner
Gordon
Nurkic
By that I mean I think other teams would come with more aggressive offers.This one belongs here: http://www.sportstwo.com/threads/crazy-trade-ideas.323880/
By that I mean I think other teams would come with more aggressive offers.
I don't think that's enough but I'd do it. I'm more interested in Napier, Vonleh, Turner, and a pick for Fournier and Simmons.View attachment 18386
Plus our first.
Evidently Orlando isn’t sold on Payton so Napier could be of interest. They also get a look at Vonleh. Aminu fits the type of athletes their front office looks for and is on a tradeable contract if they wanted to move him. So for Orlando it’s a minimum commitment financially.
We get Gordon and dump Afflalo. Mack can replace Napier. Financially, Aminu, Vonleh and Napier should combine to make about what Gordon will get in FA.
Dame
CJ
Turner
Gordon
Nurkic
View attachment 18386
Plus our first.
Evidently Orlando isn’t sold on Payton so Napier could be of interest. They also get a look at Vonleh. Aminu fits the type of athletes their front office looks for and is on a tradeable contract if they wanted to move him. So for Orlando it’s a minimum commitment financially.
We get Gordon and dump Afflalo. Mack can replace Napier. Financially, Aminu, Vonleh and Napier should combine to make about what Gordon will get in FA.
Dame
CJ
Turner
Gordon
Nurkic
Stats-wise he is having way better year than last year. I think they just don't want to pay him max. We shouldn't either though.Why is it that the perception of Gordon has changed so dramatically in a years time? Last year he was considered one of the best young players in the league and now all of a sudden the Magic want to move him? Is he just having a down year or has he really regressed that bad? I don’t get it, probably because I never watch Magic games.
Why is it that the perception of Gordon has changed so dramatically in a years time? Last year he was considered one of the best young players in the league and now all of a sudden the Magic want to move him? Is he just having a down year or has he really regressed that bad? I don’t get it, probably because I never watch Magic games.
I don't think that's enough but I'd do it. I'm more interested in Napier, Vonleh, Turner, and a pick for Fournier and Simmons.
Stats-wise he is having way better year than last year. I think they just don't want to pay him max. We shouldn't either though.
I really think there’s gotta be a three way deal between Milwaukee, LAC, and Portland that makes a lot of sense. I’m too drunk to figure it out now tho.
Yeeee
Jordan to Milwaukee
Parker to Portland
Picks to LA