Lukee
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2018
- Messages
- 1,031
- Likes
- 1,068
- Points
- 113
Would you do Leonard and a 1st for Bradley?
Of course
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would you do Leonard and a 1st for Bradley?
So we get a SF who can shoot. Randle is a guy you won't want coming at you so most defenders don't sag far off of him. Give him space and he'll slice you up.The only problem I have with Randle is he can't shoot threes. I don't think it's an issue but I suspect our front office might.
Would you do Leonard and a 1st for Bradley?
Green has a player option for next season, Leonard has 2 years remaining. Green is easily playable. Leonard...Would you do Leonard and a 1st for Bradley?
Hell NO.Hell yes
I can see us trying to acquire Randle for sure, even if it means giving up Davis.So we get a SF who can shoot. Randle is a guy you won't want coming at you so most defenders don't sag far off of him. Give him space and he'll slice you up.
DEN willing to give up a 1st for someone to take Faried. Now maybe we could get them to take one of our shit contracts but not give us a first (and at least we aren't giving up a first either to get rid of a albatross).
Leonard and Layman for Faried works.
http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=yajlkgxy
How exciting!Adrian Wojnarowski
Indiana has been aggressive in offering its salary space to extract a first-round pick for absorbing a bad contract, league sources tell ESPN. Pacers would send Al Jefferson back in those deals.
------------------------------
May be Portlands only chance at ridding themselves of a bad contract.
I doubt that Indy and Ptld would negotiate anything.....How exciting!
IF we can't move Vonleh or Leonard or Harkless or Turner then you might have to consider this because you can't pay Napier and Davis this summer in that case anyways. I still would probably turn it down since Napier and Davis are two guys who I think SHOULD be on our team next year (as in they bring value and will continue compared to their contract - both now and going forward). I would however send Noah with Leonard instead if they were interested. That gets them a little savings going forward.I assume they want to give up 1st in order to shed Faried's salary, not take someone who is even worse, even if that's without the terrible deal. They'd need to get expirings from us - for example Napier and Davis?
This system is so broken.These Several teams would be the top 2 teams from the West and the top 3 teams from the east. They can afford to wait and get someone for free (because players want to go ring-chasing).
Neil fucked us over. The summer of 16 was a disaster. The lack of cap smoothing was such poor foresight by both the teams' front offices and the players association. GS made out like bandits because of this and teams like ours get royally screwed over....of which Portland is unable to participate due to being in the Lux Tax. So much fun what Neil has done to this roster.
What is so broken about the system? Good teams plan ahead and can take advantage of it.This system is so broken.
Neil fucked us over. The summer of 16 was a disaster. The lack of cap smoothing was such poor foresight by both the teams' front offices and the players association. GS made out like bandits because of this and teams like ours get royally screwed over.
And how exactly do you know that? You really believe that everything that is happening amongst GMs is portrayed in rumors?
That's not true as we still have the MLE as well as the approximately 13 mil trade exception that could be used. All depends on what PA will allow as it would cost some luxury tax money....of which Portland is unable to participate due to being in the Lux Tax. So much fun what Neil has done to this roster.
What is so broken about the system? Good teams plan ahead and can take advantage of it.
Teams with less foresight (like Portland) end up making stupid decisions, which have a compounding effect.
That's the way the world operates.... People (or teams) that do stuff better than their piers are the ones who succeed.
Just one (of many) examples, would be the Varejao trade.What is so broken about the system? Good teams plan ahead and can take advantage of it.
Teams with less foresight (like Portland) end up making stupid decisions, which have a compounding effect.
That's the way the world operates.... People (or teams) that do stuff better than their piers are the ones who succeed.
Pretty sure that was Neil doing Andy and his agent (Dan Fegan) a solid. Agreed on how small decisions tend to blow up in this environment.Just one (of many) examples, would be the Varejao trade.
We were under the floor & NO got a first from Cleveland to take him on. Instead of keeping him on the roster until June and trade him again in the off-season, NO cut him and stretched his contract. We are still have Varejao's $2M cap hit on our books. His contract is going to cost Portland $3M in tax this year & another $3M for the next two years.
The year we cut him, we were under the salary floor - so we could have kept him without any additional cost. It's little things like that 'small' decision that makes a big difference.
Are they; has anyone seen them make a lot of crazy moves? If the Spurs want Bradley, then I do. Vonleh, Connaughton, Swanigan and Layman for Bradley. Or Harkless and a first and a second. Or a first plus Vonleh plus Davis.Green and 1st round pick for Bradley? Spurs crazy
Although our draft pick will likely be higher than Spurs.Green has a player option for next season, Leonard has 2 years remaining. Green is easily playable. Leonard...
These two offers are very very different, and often lead to fans pissed at the deadline that WE didn't do a deal that another team did, as if they were similar assets.