Official Jerami Grant trade rumors/ideas thread

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
I am also fine keeping Grant. Just don't run so many ISOs. I want to see more...."Player movement; Ball movement."
 
I'm ok keeping him too - just hope he remembers how to shoot this year because yikes.
 
Samuel said:
can't believe we're in year 4 of sharpe's career and we're at 'well, jerami grant has to start to keep his trade value from cratering inside of the existing crater.'
Click to expand...
If sharpe is Him, it won't matter if Grant is on the team or not
 
Samuel said:
can't believe we're in year 4 of sharpe's career and we're at 'well, jerami grant has to start to keep his trade value from cratering inside of the existing crater.'
Click to expand...
Don't worry - it will only continue until 2028.
 
Stay or go, time to get this back to the top spot.

1. A 3 forward rotation of Deni, Toumani, and Jerami is strong.
2. His contract ends when Jrue’s does.
3. His fashion sense ups the overall average of the Blazers.
4. When Dame comes back, he has Grant as an ‘old’ buddy.
5. His dollars going on for a bit prevents other bad signings (mostly).
 
We have only pulled 2 trades with LAL in our history according to the internet. Last time was 1980. This is the team we have traded the least with. The last time we got a 2nd rounder that turned into Kersey.
 
So sounds like the Lakers wouldn't even want to ship off their crap unused parts for Grant?

upload_2025-7-2_16-33-35.png

Same salary this year and Vanderbilt has same 3 year contract. So for LA its basically getting 3 years of Grant for $40 million total - not too many dollars. But sucks if we can't even get rid of him for such little/zero value.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2025-7-2_16-33-35.png
    upload_2025-7-2_16-33-35.png
    180.8 KB · Views: 74
I always hated the idea of having the increasing salaries for all of Nurk/Ant/Grant... we were projected as a lottery team every year we signed these guys. We should've done declining dollar deals so they at least had a bit more trade value at the end of their deals.
 
SharpesTriumph said:
So sounds like the Lakers wouldn't even want to ship off their crap unused parts for Grant?

View attachment 74420

Same salary this year and Vanderbilt has same 3 year contract. So for LA its basically getting 3 years of Grant for $40 million total - not too many dollars. But sucks if we can't even get rid of him for such little/zero value.
Click to expand...

Gotta be honest....... I'd rather keep Grant. That's a steaming pile of shit and Cronin has shown that he won't offload a contract just to offload it and bring back garbage.
 
Natebishop3 said:
Gotta be honest....... I'd rather keep Grant. That's a steaming pile of shit and Cronin has shown that he won't offload a contract just to offload it and bring back garbage.
Click to expand...
Could Vanderbilt play a defensive backup role for us? If so this gets us out of 2/3 of Grant contract.

If we think Grant can accept a reduced role probably better to roll with the roster as is and see how it goes.
 
Grant isn't going anywhere
 
SharpesTriumph said:
Could Vanderbilt play a defensive backup role for us? If so this gets us out of 2/3 of Grant contract.

If we think Grant can accept a reduced role probably better to roll with the roster as is and see how it goes.
Click to expand...
Problem is that Grant can shoot. Or at least he has shown in the past that he can shoot. It's all going to hinge on his attitude.
 
Has anyone floated this one? Bulls are sick of Patrick Williams, I think, and might want a veteran influence on their team.

upload_2025-7-2_18-43-18.png

Alternatively could they re-route Okoro (unless they actually value him)?

upload_2025-7-2_18-45-52.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2025-7-2_18-43-18.png
    upload_2025-7-2_18-43-18.png
    113.8 KB · Views: 53
  • upload_2025-7-2_18-45-52.png
    upload_2025-7-2_18-45-52.png
    46 KB · Views: 53
Don't forget that Washington BROOKLYN is literally required to ACQUIRE salary ($11M?) to reach the league minimum, so...
 
Last edited:
Rastapopoulos said:
Has anyone floated this one? Bulls are sick of Patrick Williams, I think, and might want a veteran influence on their team.

View attachment 74423

Alternatively could they re-route Okoro (unless they actually value him)?

View attachment 74424
Click to expand...
why would we trade for p will? just to get rid of grant? i don't think this move excites me, curious what others feel
 
inconceivable said:
why would we trade for p will? just to get rid of grant? i don't think this move excites me, curious what others feel
Click to expand...
In answer to your question, YES. The advantage of PWill is simply that he would be lower down the hierarchy and there would be no sense of obligation to start him or play him x minutes over the guys we want to play.
 
Jerami Grant will be a Blazer at the start of
next season. If not, it would be done by now.
 
Sell him on being the focal point of the second unit. Him and Scoot(not that I like that part). If he complains he can stay home with an “injury”.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top