Game Thread PLAYOFFS - ROUND 2, GAME 3: WARRIORS @ BLAZERS - 5/7/16, SATURDAY, 5:30 PM (PDT), ABC

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Are you going to the game?


  • Total voters
    47
  • Poll closed .

Users who are viewing this thread

Sickening. Just sickening. I have a friend who was a Blazer fan from the time I met him but now he "always has repped the Bay"

We've got a few fans, myself included, who are fans of other Bay Area teams. I have been a Niner fan since I was 12. I actually really liked the Warriors when they had Arenas/JRich/'Jamison. Run TMC was really before I got into basketball. Unfortunately I really don't like the Warriors now. I like Curry, but Klay is a spoiled brat and Draymond is..... a throwback. I love that I hate him.
 
Draymond Green: a classic "I hate that SOB and wish he was on my team" player.

There's plenty of those.... but when was the last time a guy was this good at defense and this arrogant? Rodman? Artest?
 
There's plenty of those.... but when was the last time a guy was this good at defense and this arrogant? Rodman? Artest?

Tough call. Lamebeer had the arrogance/complain to the refs act down pat - but I always felt his defense was over-rated. Rick Mahorn maybe?
 
I hardly see any love for Aminu in this thread. WTF?? He's delivering big time.
Aminu did in fact have a great game. He was a huge contributor in the win.

Will they continue to leave him open next game? If they do will he make them pay? I'm going with yes, and yes.

:cheers:
 
Ok so I'm over at the Adidas facility reffing games and they have an NBA 3 point line. Shooting from the top takes strength.

Did Damian just do a step back from 5 feet further and get front iron?

He mighta missed that shot but I don't know how many of us can fathom how hard that is.
I've always wanted to shoot on an NBA 3pt line. How do you get in there
 
I've always wanted to shoot on an NBA 3pt line. How do you get in there

Gotta be staff. They are pretty Gestapo about it. I saw Wiggins there. Candace Parker. I could get you into the employee store but the facility is another animal. The best place to go for you would probably be the Beaverton Hoop.
 
@dviss1
I have a question for you.
For the Aminu dunk early in the second quarter. Would you have called that a flagrant according to the letter of the law in the NBA? Citing contact to the head/neck area flagrant 1? I'm curious for your perspective.
Apologies if you've already address this.

Edit - sorry I don't know how to find a vine for the play.
 
@dviss1
I have a question for you.
For the Aminu dunk early in the second quarter. Would you have called that a flagrant according to the letter of the law in the NBA? Citing contact to the head/neck area flagrant 1? I'm curious for your perspective.
Apologies if you've already address this.

Edit - sorry I don't know how to find a vine for the play.

 
@dviss1
I have a question for you.
For the Aminu dunk early in the second quarter. Would you have called that a flagrant according to the letter of the law in the NBA? Citing contact to the head/neck area flagrant 1? I'm curious for your perspective.
Apologies if you've already address this.

Edit - sorry I don't know how to find a vine for the play.

If you go by the letter of the law, yes that's a flagrant 1. The referees should've called that. 2 and the ball. They were probably reluctant to do that because you really want to let the players decide the game.

I however, don't believe the flagrant 1 should even be a call.

My contention is he was making a play on the ball and just couldn't get to it. I don't see one flagrant thing about it. Had I been making the call it would simply be a common foul.

Edit: great question. I love to do this. As a referee (if you want to master your craft) I watch PLENTY of video to analyze basketball plays. It's very fun for me so keep the questions coming!
 
If you go by the letter of the law, yes that's a flagrant 1. The referees should've called that. 2 and the ball. They were probably reluctant to do that because you really want to let the players decide the game.

I however, don't believe the flagrant 1 should even be a call.

My contention is he was making a play on the ball and just couldn't get to it. I don't see one flagrant thing about it. Had I been making the call it would simply be a common foul.

Agreed 100%
 
Back
Top