- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 26,226
- Likes
- 14,407
- Points
- 113
It's apparently fashionable to blame Neil right now, not that he deserves zero blame or anything. I blame the players. The players weren't "assets" because they didn't get better.
Vonleh's job was to get better... he sucks.
Bieb's job was to get better... he sucks.
Crabbe's job was to get better... he sucks.
Jake's job was to get better... he sucks.
Harkless's job was to get better... he's mediocre.
Aminu's job was to get better... he's mediocre.
The De-Beastization of Nurk this season is well documented (if he played like the last half of last season, we wouldn't be having this conversation right now).
I don't think Neil's the problem
I think the guy acquiring a bunch of players who (in your words) suck is a problem. Every player's job is to play to the best of their ability--it's completely removing any accountability from the GM to act like every player he acquired could have been great but they just didn't try hard enough or want it enough. Maybe one of those guys "didn't want it enough," but most of those guys probably did improve as much as their talent allows. The same holds true if you simply blame the coaches for not "unlocking their talent." Crabbe has continued to suck away from Portland. Nurkic played at this level in Denver too.
By your logic, how can you ever blame a GM? Just blame the players for "sucking." Cho was great, can't blame him for the players just sucking instead of improving. PatterNash was great, can't blame them for the players just sucking instead of improving.

