Rodney Hood a Blazer

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

'You (better) know nothing.....NOTHINIG!'
Everyone whom Ive spoken to that is even slightly involved in the NBA tells me LA will make a move to clear a roster spot to bring in Melo. They want it to be a move for AD but if NO wont budge than they will do something more minor to bring him in.
 
Hood is an ending contract, who's making about $3.5 mil this year.
He's listed at 6'8", 208 lb.
He's an SG/SF.
He is 26 years old - Dame's timeline, blah, blah, blah.
He was thought very highly of in Utah (actually, not at the end), but not so much in his last 1.5 years in Cleveland.
He's Left Handed (which some seem to find relevant).
Slightly increases Luxury Tax.
A roster spot has opened up.
Shooting .362 from 3 this year, .368 for his career. Should thrive in a Stotts system.


We just traded 2 guys who don't play, for one that does. So, there is a bit of a rotation squeeze.

Low Risk, High Reward type of deal - a Buy Low, Sell High sort of deal (if we sell him high!)

Plays the same position as CJ.

I like the individual players on our bench, but their negative +/- is, frankly, why we don't have a much better record. Does this fix it?

Seems like it's signalling for another trade, but Neil hasn't made the promised "consolidation trade" EVER. Many of us are crossing our fingers.

OTOH, Neil has clearly been very busy. We'll see.

Does it mean anything that this move was made four days before the deadline? I think so.
 
Turner, Curry, and Hood arent really a fit together at first glance. They are all best utilized with the ball in their hands. I wouldn’t be surprised if Turner was the guy packaged with our pick. He makes the most sense imo. Harkless can play the four and doesn’t need the ball.
We can always hope....
 
Everyone whom Ive spoken to that is even slightly involved in the NBA tells me LA will make a move to clear a roster spot to bring in Melo. They want it to be a move for AD but if NO wont budge than they will do something more minor to bring him in.

let's see...Lance Stephenson, Rajon Rondo, Javale McGee, and Melo all in the same locker room with Lebron. shouldn't be a problem
 
I don't know about that

the Blazers either had to send out 2 minimum contracts or cut a player and use their TPE....which would have added 12M in salary and tax. Portland may do like many teams do and that's go thru the season with an open roster spot. They might do auditions with 10 day contracts as well

on the other hand, having Harkless, Layman, Turner, & Hood as players best suited to the SF position seems unbalanced
One quick thought: Neil may have felt hamstrung by not having an open roster spot. He could also have something else lined up.
 
One quick thought: Neil may have felt hamstrung by not having an open roster spot. He could also have something else lined up.

sure...I was just pointing out that the trade would not have worked without 2 minimum contract players going out. Only way it was a legal trade so that could have been the reason rather then something else lined up
 
let's see...Lance Stephenson, Rajon Rondo, Javale McGee, and Melo all in the same locker room with Lebron. shouldn't be a problem
For the record Im not claiming to have anyone Id consider a ‘legit’ NBA source, just a few friends who work with or around NBA teams and they have all said that they believe Melo will be in LA. They know more than I do. We’ll see!
 
I don't know about that

the Blazers either had to send out 2 minimum contracts or cut a player and use their TPE....which would have added 12M in salary and tax. Portland may do like many teams do and that's go thru the season with an open roster spot. They might do auditions with 10 day contracts as well

on the other hand, having Harkless, Layman, Turner, & Hood as players best suited to the SF position seems unbalanced

4 Sfs, all just about good enough to be bench players on a serious contender. Olshey's philosophy of roster construction puzzles me.
 
4 Sfs, all just about good enough to be bench players on a serious contender. Olshey's philosophy of roster construction puzzles me.
Harkless and Layman are 3/4s. Turner and Hood are 2/3s. Each of these players can play multiple positions.
 
You think or you hope? :)

Bit of both. The roster looks cluttered. We just added a wing that averages over 25 minutes a game. Those minutes will have to come at the expense of someone else, and I don’t know how you can justify benching someone like Layman. Even Meyers has earned his time, as has Collins. Turner ain’t getting benched. Neither is Curry. Stotts wants Moe with the starters. So uhhhhhh, yeah another move is probably coming.
 
Harkless and Layman are 3/4s. Turner and Hood are 2/3s. Each of these players can play multiple positions.

I’d be down to play Layman at the four but so far I haven’t seen much evidence that that’s something Stotts feels comfortable with. Plus he’s closer to a two than a four imo.
 
Bit of both. The roster looks cluttered. We just added a wing that averages over 25 minutes a game. Those minutes will have to come at the expense of someone else, and I don’t know how you can justify benching someone like Layman. Even Meyers has earned his time, as has Collins. Turner ain’t getting benched. Neither is Curry. Stotts wants Moe with the starters. So uhhhhhh, yeah another move is probably coming.

More talent is never a problem and it will be up to the players to earn their rotation minutes. If one sits, that will likely mean the other is producing. It's a good position to be in to have players pushing each other to be their best.
 
Wonder what the immediate rotation is, assuming there isn’t another trade before Tuesday. Seems kind of cluttered.

Dame
CJ
Harkless
Aminu
Nurkic

Curry
Hood
Turner
Collins
Leonard

No way Layman gets benched. Seems like there will be another move.
That's what I immediately thought.
 
Grades from our friends at BE (especially Bonejones friend Dan Marang):
Dan Marang (@DMarang): POBONO strikes again! It’s another move on the periphery that doesn’t cost much but has an outside chance of making Portland a better team. Nik Stauskasshowed he could shoot, that much is clear, but he also showed he continues to be a liability defensively and quickly found his way out of the rotation. Wade Baldwin made enough noise at Summer League to get a guaranteed contract — good for him. Rodney Hood however, isn’t impacted by the departure of those guys because neither was getting rotation minutes. In fact, Hood now figures the be thrust into the biggest minutes dispute of the roster: Maurice Harkless v. Jake Layman.

It’s hard to believe that Portland is done dealing. Not that they have an embarrassment of riches at the wing now, it’s just that they have perhaps too many bodies there with undefined roles. Harkless lands on the defensive side of the spectrum with his offense lagging behind, Layman clearly lands on the offensive side with his defense falling to the side. Meanwhile, you’ve got Hood, who probably splits the difference best, but all three leave something to be desired as far as consistency goes. So, it’s another deal on the edges with a chance to make a splash. But the impact is probably limited. Bonus points for making a move that MIGHT free up enough space in the rotation to make someone like Harkless (and his +10M salary) expendable. The move before the move...maybe. GRADE: B-

Brian Freeman (@BrianFreeman24) : Rodney Hood is only a year removed from averaging 16 points per game for the Jazz on 39 percent shooting from beyond the arc. He’s not a great defender, but he is lengthy and brings some needed size to the perimeter. Hood can play either wing position. He can shoot, pass, and drive better than Portland’s current small forward options. Given those advantages, he should walk into the locker room as the Blazers’ new starting small forward. Unfortunately, that is not a very high bar. Harkless and Layman have both had their moments, but both forwards rate relatively low in the NBA’s starting small forward hierarchy. Hood is an upgrade, but he isn't much higher on that list.

End of the day, Portland needed an upgrade and they got it. I was sure that the Blazers were going to set on cap-saving moves at the deadline. Given this basketball-related move, I am nearly euphoric over the move. For two second-round picks and two players that are not part of the rotation, it was a low-cost upgrade. The open roster spot could turn out to be an added benefit of the deal. This grade could increase depending on a corresponding move. For now, it’s a minor upgrade, but a one that needed to be made. Grade: B

Steve Dewald (@SteveDHoops): Replacing Nik Stauskas with a serviceable player on the perimeter is huge. Stauskas, who joined Seth Curry as the Blazers’ premier summer additions, has fallen out completely out of the rotation. He crossed the 10-minute threshold just three times in January, which likely paved the way for this move.

Hood’s exile to the Cavaliers probably has many fans wondering who exactly he is. Prior to moving to Cleveland, it appeared that Hood was primed for a lucrative extension with Utah. He was an awkward fit next to LeBron James down the stretch of last season and he was just another face on a listless Cavaliers squad this season. On offense, Hood has shown he can hit open shots and make decent decisions off the dribble. Both of those traits will be welcomed in Portland.

Along with adding Hood, the Blazers created another roster spot and only slightly increased their luxury tax bill. On its own, this is a favorable trade for Portland. If Olshey can land another impact player, this trade will only look better. Grade: B+

Isaiah De Los Santos (@IsaiahDeLos): THEY MADE A TRADE. THEY ACTUALLY MADE A TRADE. Whew. Now that the initial shock has worn off, I’m feeling good about this move. Hood has proven as a decent wing scorer throughout his career (he’s averaging 12.8 points per game over 4.5 seasons) and brings much-needed size to the forward spot (he’s listed as 6-foot-8).

He’s never shot below 35.9 percent from three-point range throughout his 4.5 seasons, topping out at 38.1 percent last season. Another note: he’s shooting 44.1 percent on “wide open” (closest defender 6+ feet away) three-point shots this season. That would be welcomed in Portland.

Given his shooting track record, he brings a level of trust that I can’t say is fully there when Moe Harkless or Al-Farouq Aminu tee one up from deep. Speaking of Harkless, Hood brings competition for the starting small forward spot. Hood seems like an instant-starter, but minutes between him, Harkless and Layman will be fought over — unless a second move comes to clear up that situation.

The team desperately needed wing production. It’s not a blockbuster move, but it’s one in the right direction. I can appreciate that. Grade: B+
 
Grades from our friends at BE (especially Bonejones friend Dan Marang):
Dan Marang (@DMarang): team. Nik Stauskasshowed he could shoot, that much is clear, but he also showed he continues to be a liability defensively and quickly found his way out of the rotation.
Actually I think he was out of the rotation because he could NOT shoot.
 
Trades grades are weird in the best of times. 4 days before the deadline, even more so. My grades look like this:

If Hood returns to Utah form: A
If we make the consolidation trade we've waited for, then this trade is great: A
If, as a result of the trade, our bench +/- improves significantly: A
If we don't make another trade this deadline: B-
If we let Hood and/or Aminu walk to get under the tax: D

There isn't one grade, and multiple of these things could happen yielding a composite of the above. There's a lot of ways in which this
trade ends up being an A. However, until these things happen, I'll be waiting to see if another move comes.


Grades from our friends at BE (especially Bonejones friend Dan Marang):
Dan Marang (@DMarang): POBONO strikes again! It’s another move on the periphery that doesn’t cost much but has an outside chance of making Portland a better team. Nik Stauskasshowed he could shoot, that much is clear, but he also showed he continues to be a liability defensively and quickly found his way out of the rotation. Wade Baldwin made enough noise at Summer League to get a guaranteed contract — good for him. Rodney Hood however, isn’t impacted by the departure of those guys because neither was getting rotation minutes. In fact, Hood now figures the be thrust into the biggest minutes dispute of the roster: Maurice Harkless v. Jake Layman.

It’s hard to believe that Portland is done dealing. Not that they have an embarrassment of riches at the wing now, it’s just that they have perhaps too many bodies there with undefined roles. Harkless lands on the defensive side of the spectrum with his offense lagging behind, Layman clearly lands on the offensive side with his defense falling to the side. Meanwhile, you’ve got Hood, who probably splits the difference best, but all three leave something to be desired as far as consistency goes. So, it’s another deal on the edges with a chance to make a splash. But the impact is probably limited. Bonus points for making a move that MIGHT free up enough space in the rotation to make someone like Harkless (and his +10M salary) expendable. The move before the move...maybe. GRADE: B-

Brian Freeman (@BrianFreeman24) : Rodney Hood is only a year removed from averaging 16 points per game for the Jazz on 39 percent shooting from beyond the arc. He’s not a great defender, but he is lengthy and brings some needed size to the perimeter. Hood can play either wing position. He can shoot, pass, and drive better than Portland’s current small forward options. Given those advantages, he should walk into the locker room as the Blazers’ new starting small forward. Unfortunately, that is not a very high bar. Harkless and Layman have both had their moments, but both forwards rate relatively low in the NBA’s starting small forward hierarchy. Hood is an upgrade, but he isn't much higher on that list.

End of the day, Portland needed an upgrade and they got it. I was sure that the Blazers were going to set on cap-saving moves at the deadline. Given this basketball-related move, I am nearly euphoric over the move. For two second-round picks and two players that are not part of the rotation, it was a low-cost upgrade. The open roster spot could turn out to be an added benefit of the deal. This grade could increase depending on a corresponding move. For now, it’s a minor upgrade, but a one that needed to be made. Grade: B

Steve Dewald (@SteveDHoops): Replacing Nik Stauskas with a serviceable player on the perimeter is huge. Stauskas, who joined Seth Curry as the Blazers’ premier summer additions, has fallen out completely out of the rotation. He crossed the 10-minute threshold just three times in January, which likely paved the way for this move.

Hood’s exile to the Cavaliers probably has many fans wondering who exactly he is. Prior to moving to Cleveland, it appeared that Hood was primed for a lucrative extension with Utah. He was an awkward fit next to LeBron James down the stretch of last season and he was just another face on a listless Cavaliers squad this season. On offense, Hood has shown he can hit open shots and make decent decisions off the dribble. Both of those traits will be welcomed in Portland.

Along with adding Hood, the Blazers created another roster spot and only slightly increased their luxury tax bill. On its own, this is a favorable trade for Portland. If Olshey can land another impact player, this trade will only look better. Grade: B+

Isaiah De Los Santos (@IsaiahDeLos): THEY MADE A TRADE. THEY ACTUALLY MADE A TRADE. Whew. Now that the initial shock has worn off, I’m feeling good about this move. Hood has proven as a decent wing scorer throughout his career (he’s averaging 12.8 points per game over 4.5 seasons) and brings much-needed size to the forward spot (he’s listed as 6-foot-8).

He’s never shot below 35.9 percent from three-point range throughout his 4.5 seasons, topping out at 38.1 percent last season. Another note: he’s shooting 44.1 percent on “wide open” (closest defender 6+ feet away) three-point shots this season. That would be welcomed in Portland.

Given his shooting track record, he brings a level of trust that I can’t say is fully there when Moe Harkless or Al-Farouq Aminu tee one up from deep. Speaking of Harkless, Hood brings competition for the starting small forward spot. Hood seems like an instant-starter, but minutes between him, Harkless and Layman will be fought over — unless a second move comes to clear up that situation.

The team desperately needed wing production. It’s not a blockbuster move, but it’s one in the right direction. I can appreciate that. Grade: B+
 
Portland Coach Terry Stotts would make no comment on the deal, apparently waiting for the trade to be confirmed by the league office.

But his players had something to say.

“I don’t like that he went to Duke,” CJ McCollum joked. “But besides that, I think he can play. He’s a solid player. He’s a big guard, good mid-range, pretty good pick-and-roll.

“I know he’s in a contract year, so he’ll be eager to get out there and play well.”

Damian Lillard said, “I love him as a player. I respect him. I remember when he was in Utah, he was breaking into the rotation and he always came in and gave them a spark. He’s a good-sized wing who can score the ball, shoot the ball, solid defender – it will be interesting to see how he will fit in with us."

Hood is in the final season of his contract but did sign a one-year qualifying offer with Cleveland, which meant he had to agree to the trade to Portland.

https://www.nbcsports.com/northwest...hood-roster-spot-without-dealing-major-assets
 
I'm just not a huge fan of Prince's after watching him several times this year as he is as inconsistent as our other small forwards.
Let's be honest, you watched 2 Atlanta games both of which were shortly after he returned from missing several weeks with an injury. If I recall correctly you've been in favor of acquiring Hood for awhile and he's inconsistent too.
 
Let's be honest, you watched 2 Atlanta games both of which were shortly after he returned from missing several weeks with an injury. If I recall correctly you've been in favor of acquiring Hood for awhile and he's inconsistent too.

Not me and i have seen several Atlanta games this year as i had league pass for a bit from my son. Why do you think i have only seen 2? As for Hood i may have casually mentioned him but the player i have coveted and have expressed in this forum is Jaylon Brown. I am aware that Hood can be inconsistent as well but the deal was such a low cost one that it made sense to take a chance on him.
 
Not bad. But...

gauge_linear.gif
 
Hood > Prince.

Better decision maker on both ends. Most of Hood's defensive issues are physical, Prince fucks up more often.

Prince looks good some nights offensively but plays outside of his abilities far too often.
 
SG: CJ - 35, Hood 13
SF: Harkless - 15, Turner - 24, Layman 9


Doesn't seem like many minutes for either Harkless, Hood or Layman...

...unless there is another move coming.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top