- Joined
- May 24, 2007
- Messages
- 73,114
- Likes
- 10,945
- Points
- 113
Which is why it might be nice to audition Evans for 30 games, to see if he's a viable C.J. replacement/improvement.
BNM
We're in violent agreement.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which is why it might be nice to audition Evans for 30 games, to see if he's a viable C.J. replacement/improvement.
BNM
We could use our $12.5M TPE on him. The TPE can be split so we'd sill have $9M of TPE left. We would have to make roster space.
We're in violent agreement.
If we get under the luxury tax enough, we'd have the Full MLE, correct? That's ~$8.5M. EDIT: Just saw BNMs post.Tyreke Evans. Because he's on a 1-year deal, the Blazers won't have his bird rights this summer. Meaning that if they want to keep him, they'll have no more than the taxpayer MLE, or about 5.5M to offer him. He'll almost undoubtedly command more than that, meaning that even if they trade for him now, there is virtually zero chance of Portland keeping him beyond this summer.
We'd have to be far enough below the apron that using the MLE wouldn't put us over. That'd be about 5M under the tax line to start. And then we'd be hard capped at the apron line.If we get under the luxury tax enough, we'd have the Full MLE, correct? That's ~$8.5M.
The NBA should let teams sign player a to mutli-year deals with raises based on exceptions. Ex. Evans Yr1: $8.5M (MLE)
Evans Yr2: $14M (Early Bird)
Evans Yr3: $18M (Full Bird)
I'd support getting him and trying to win him over. He could make us much better this year, and if that's possible for someone were gonna lose anyway (Vonleh) and a 2nd round pick which we could buy back in the future, theres really no risk.
With all things being equal, it'd work with simply shedding Turners or Leonard's contract.We'd have to be far enough below the apron that using the MLE wouldn't put us over. That'd be about 5M under the tax line to start. And then we'd be hard capped at the apron line.
You have a different definition of "simply" than I do.With all things being equal, it'd work with simply shedding Turners or Leonard's contract.
Ideal! I wouldn't give up anything of value for an Evans rental that doesn't even give us Bird Rights.What about a simple swap based on Napier for Evans.
In a heartbeat. Zero chance the Grizz would be interested in that though.Would y'all do Turner and a 1st for Evans and expirings? Could shed us Turners contract for a 1st, which is already an option we should look at. Opens up full MLE to resign Evans, who s basically a much better version of Turner. Memphis is already in cap space he'll with Conley, Parsons, and Gasol, and can't land FAs anyway, so maybe they'd value the pick enough to take Turner?
Would y'all do Turner and a 1st for Evans and expirings? Could shed us Turners contract for a 1st, which is already an option we should look at. Opens up fill MLE to resign Evans, who s basically a much better version of Turner. Memphis is already in cap space he'll with Conley, Parsons, and Gasol, and can't land FAs anyway, so maybe they'd value the pick enough to take Turner?
We'd have to be far enough below the apron that using the MLE wouldn't put us over. That'd be about 5M under the tax line to start. And then we'd be hard capped at the apron line.
It's not like they'd have to play him, just take on his contract to receive a 1st.Sure if we could get Evans for the the MLE....but that sounds extremely impossible. And I think Memphis is happy with Brooks so not sure while they rebuild that they would want ET
Then I'd raise the offer to:In a heartbeat. Zero chance the Grizz would be interested in that though.
Not saying doing so would be simple, just that hypothetically we could get under with a single move.You have a different definition of "simply" than I do.
Why would they want Turner at all? Surely Vonleh and picks isn't enough compensation to get them to take that albatross off our hands.Then I'd raise the offer to:
Turner, Vonleh, 2018 POR 1st, 2019 MIN/LAL 2nd
They wouldn't want Turner, I'm just wondering if they'd take on his contract to receive the compensation. I feel like they might. Turner doesn't hurt future flexibility, as they have none. They're also not at the point where Turner would get them deep into the tax.Why would they want Turner at all? Surely Vonleh and picks isn't enough compensation to get them to take that albatross off our hands.
It's not like they'd have to play him, just take on his contract to receive a 1st.
That's the kicker. We'd be hard capped at approximately $127M. So there would be a legitimate chance that we would be unable to re-sign Nurk, Ed, or other FA that we'd like to. Also, we wouldn't be able to trade taking on any more salary.We'd have to be far enough below the apron that using the MLE wouldn't put us over. That'd be about 5M under the tax line to start. And then we'd be hard capped at the apron line.
No chance Memphis would do that.Would y'all do Turner and a 1st for Evans and expirings? Could shed us Turners contract for a 1st, which is already an option we should look at. Opens up full MLE to resign Evans, who s basically a much better version of Turner. Memphis is already in cap space he'll with Conley, Parsons, and Gasol, and can't land FAs anyway, so maybe they'd value the pick enough to take Turner?
Give them Meyers, convince them he is the next Marc Vasol5
Sausage fingers and a phone do not make a good mixMarc Vasol?
Marc Vasoline!
Report: Sixers interested in Tyreke Evans trade, but Grizzlies want first-round pick
https://www.yahoo.com/sports/report-sixers-interested-tyreke-evans-174147572.html
