Politics The 3rd Presidential Debate - Turd Sandwich vs Giant Douche!

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
e_blazer said:
Inventive, but no.

(Straining to try to avoid making a comment that she shouldn't have lowered the drawbridge in the first place, but failing.)
Click to expand...
battering ram.jpg
 

Attachments

  • battering ram.jpg
    battering ram.jpg
    14.1 KB · Views: 52
blue32 said:
Honest question. Do you think it's okay to use abortion as birth control, if the person had waited to long to use the other things like "morning after" or whatever?
Click to expand...
Nobody uses abortion for birth control.

It's not painless and a terrible ordeal to go through.
 
e_blazer said:
Inventive, but no.

(Straining to try to avoid making a comment that she shouldn't have lowered the drawbridge in the first place, but failing.)
Click to expand...
Killing in self defemse in the home is the castle doctrine.

I see the woman's body as her castle.
 
The womb is the woman's property.

Reagan's Treasury Secy and then chief of staff.

He wrote, in 1979 that abortion is a form of self defense. This in his paper on rewriting Roe based upon better reasons abortion should be legal. Among those, the massive burden placed upon the woman against her will.

http://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1344&context=articles

...I shall suggest a similar equal protection argument, based on the notion that abortion can be regarded as a problem in the law of self-defense...​

A fairly long detailed explanation of abortion as self defense by Nicholas Johnson, law professor at Fordham Law School.

Open the pdf and scroll to page 6.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1500026

  1. III. Self-Defense as a Constitutional Building Block: The Derivative Right to Abortion.

...

This gives us two levels of support for the right of self-defense. First, within the context of the voluminous scho- larship on the individual self-defense pedigree of the Second Amendment, we can understand Harlan's and O'Connor's statements as direct recognition of an individual right to arms. Second, for those who would raise the standard objec- tions that the Second Amendment is a militia-centric political right, observe that the residual conception of liberty refe- renced by O'Connor yields a right of self-defense earlier and easier than it supports the established right to abortion. Certainly more basic than "defining ones own concept of existence" n50 is preserving ones existence from wrongful physical threats. This is a point Casey seems to acknowledge with its description of foundational rights in the first eight amendments supporting a broader set of unenumerated rights essential to liberty. [*199]
​
"Casey" mentioned above is a SCOtUS abortion case:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/505/833
 
Last edited:
And if you thought it couldn't get any worse, watch the Al Smith dinner tonight. Ouch.

I thought Trump was supposed to be able to read a room?

barfo
 
Yes of course blue uses the women are stupid argument. He "knows" a sexually active woman who does not use birth control, instead she just has five or six abortions a year every year from, say 15 to 40. Sure. And because of this mythical woman every other woman must be forced to carry every pregnancy to term unless she gets special permission from him
 
MarAzul said:
I thought he did well. He pissed them off in no time.
Click to expand...

Well, I guess if that was the goal, then sure. After all, they deserved it, what with their donating to charity and all.

He's successfully pissed off about 65% of the population too. It's an impressive record of achievement.

barfo
 
I told my wife the best method to approve a presidential party candidate is to have a simulation test of world calamity to determine if they can handle crisis. If a military pilot has to endure simulation tests, then the person who may one day decide to bomb a country ought to be given a series of pressure tests. For a second requirement, the staff that worked for the candidates should be interviewed by designated personnel to determine if they have leadership traits. If that protocol was established we could have a number of qualified ethical people instead of a self absorbed republican and and slick democratic for this better of two evils election.
 
barfo said:
Well, I guess if that was the goal, then sure. After all, they deserved it, what with their donating to charity and all.

He's successfully pissed off about 65% of the population too. It's an impressive record of achievement.

barfo
Click to expand...


Get the sand out of the vagina (likely to be moderated by our resident SJW).
 
blue32 said:
Get the sand out of the vagina (likely to be moderated by our resident SJW).
Click to expand...

If you are talking about me all I edit are personal insults. Did you mean this as a personal insult? Are you saying that Barfo is a woman and that is somehow bad? disgusting?
 
SlyPokerDog said:
If you are talking about me all I edit are personal insults. Did you mean this as a personal insult? Are you saying that Barfo is a woman and that is somehow bad? disgusting?
Click to expand...

I've always thought being called a woman was a good thing. Women tend to start less fights, steal less, start far fewer wars, kill fewer people and put up with idiotic men better than we do.
 
SlyPokerDog said:
If you are talking about me all I edit are personal insults. Did you mean this as a personal insult? Are you saying that Barfo is a woman and that is somehow bad? disgusting?
Click to expand...


SlyPokerDog is a cuck!

Yet another term would be to "get the stick outta your ass" since nobody identifies as sticks (yet) I'm sure it wont be found offensive ;)
 
blue32 said:
SlyPokerDog is a cuck!

Yet another term would be to "get the stick outta your ass" since nobody identifies as sticks (yet) I'm sure it wont be found offensive ;)
Click to expand...

So you did mean that as a personal insult.
 
SlyPokerDog said:
So you did mean that as a personal insult.
Click to expand...

Uh no; Barfo said 65% of the people were offended from the Catholic dinner thing. I said "get the sand out of the vagina" meaning, people need to fucking chill. The two people I was referring to in my last response was Hilliar and Trumps as cucks, but sure, go ahead and censor the shit, it's your shtick.
 
blue32 said:
Uh no; Barfo said 65% of the people were offended from the Catholic dinner thing.
Click to expand...

No, actually that wasn't what I meant. Not sure why it would bother you so much even if that was what I meant, but perhaps there is sand somewhere?

I meant the 65% remark to mean the voters he's pissed off overall, not specifically with his dinner failure last night.

barfo
 
barfo said:
No, actually that wasn't what I meant. Not sure why it would bother you so much even if that was what I meant, but perhaps there is sand somewhere?

I meant the 65% remark to mean the voters he's pissed off overall, not specifically with his dinner failure last night.

barfo
Click to expand...

Gotcha! And, it didn't bother me. But I wasn't calling you a cuck nor calling you a woman, or whatever Sly suggested. I was referring all of my post to that 65% you were bringing up.
 
blue32 said:
Gotcha! And, it didn't bother me. But I wasn't calling you a cuck nor calling you a woman, or whatever Sly suggested. I was referring all of my post to that 65% you were bringing up.
Click to expand...

Ok then. Back to the topic at hand. MarAzul seemed to suggest that it was Trump's intent to offend people. Would you agree or disagree that that was Trump's intent?

barfo
 
barfo said:
Ok then. Back to the topic at hand. MarAzul seemed to suggest that it was Trump's intent to offend people. Would you agree or disagree that that was Trump's intent?

barfo
Click to expand...


I think Trump's intent is to show the American people as best as possible how corrupt Hillary, her campaign staff, and the DNC (and sub's) are. Secondly I think he's trying to show the American people how bias the media is, and how they are bed with the Democrats, so to speak.

Lastly, I think he's trying to draw attention to her corruption in an effort to get the FBI/DOJ to readdress the situation and possibly press charges against her; he and many others honestly think that she shouldn't be allowed to run, because of the things she's done.
 
IMO, the first part of Trump's speech was pretty good and he came across in a more likable manner than I've seen him. My guess would be that the paid writers on his staff wrote those jokes. The vicious stuff at the end was pure Trump. You can only keep a good asshole down for a short time.
 
e_blazer said:
IMO, the first part of Trump's speech was pretty good and he came across in a more likable manner than I've seen him. My guess would be that the paid writers on his staff wrote those jokes. The vicious stuff at the end was pure Trump. You can only keep a good asshole down for a short time.
Click to expand...

I was surprised at how bad a comedian he was, given his acting experience. The jokes weren't bad - some were pretty funny. But his timing was awful, and he stepped on his own punchlines. It was like someone handed him the jokes as he walked up to the podium, he had no idea what he was saying.

Also, the 'Pardon me' joke - if he'd just stopped after saying that she said "Pardon me", it would have been perfect. But instead he went on to explain the joke not once, but twice.

And then, he started being nasty instead of funny.

barfo
 
barfo said:
I was surprised at how bad a comedian he was, given his acting experience. The jokes weren't bad - some were pretty funny. But his timing was awful, and he stepped on his own punchlines. It was like someone handed him the jokes as he walked up to the podium, he had no idea what he was saying.

Also, the 'Pardon me' joke - if he'd just stopped after saying that she said "Pardon me", it would have been perfect. But instead he went on to explain the joke not once, but twice.

And then, he started being nasty instead of funny.

barfo
Click to expand...

Yeah, in retrospect I was being generous. The jokes were good, but his delivery pretty much sucked. The nasty stuff was off-the-charts bad, IMO. The last debate, followed by this performance should seal the deal for Hillary.
 
My favorite line from the evening (out of context by itself):

But Donald really is as healthy as a horse, you know, the one Vladimir Putin rides around on.

barfo
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top