KingSpeed
Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2008
- Messages
- 63,341
- Likes
- 22,520
- Points
- 113
- The Nuggets are a legitimate contender and create match-up problem for the likely #2-4 seeds. Their height and rebounding creates match-up issues for the best teams in the West.
Why the #2 seed and not the #1 seed? There's not that big of a difference, is there? Who is this #1 seed you think they can't beat?
- The Nuggets have had the toughest schedule in the NBA thus far, and their record (and especially not one particular loss) can be taken for a measure of their ability.
Yes, but they are vets who should understand how to win on the road, especially if theyre going to upset your #2-4 seed. The Blazers had to work 5 people who had never played in the NBA before into the rotation while playing 12 of their first 19 on the road. That seems a lot more challenging to me and yet, they have a 15-14 record, one less loss than the experienced Nuggets.
- The New York Knicks are not as good as their current record, and factors that include J.R. Smith, their age, Amare Stoudemire, etc. will eventually bring them down to reality. "Reality" might mean 2nd or 3rd place in the East, but the Knicks wouldn't have home court advantage, in my opinion, if they played an 82 game season out West.
You make no sense. They are currently in 2nd place. How can they be brought down to 2nd place? I personally think they're better than the record because Melo has been out a lot. I've seen them play on TV and in person and I think they could win it all this year. Heat fans must be somewhat concerned.
Those were my points. I'm tired of arguing the petty bullshit, as I'm sure you are. Happy New Years to you all...
happy new year

