OT TIME for you lefties to denounce the "media"

[jonnyboy]

Pun intended huh? Amazing.

Amazing is a stretch, but thanks.

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

I'd like to apologize to @bodyman5000 and 1 for being delusional.

Long time coming.



Read the responses..

 

[SlyPokerDog]

SlyPokerDog is such a racist delusional drunk his only chance of getting laid is to crawl up a chicken's butt and wait.

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

SlyPokerDog is such a racist delusional drunk his only chance of getting laid is to crawl up a chicken's butt and wait.

True

 

[SlyPokerDog]

Long time coming.



Read the responses..

I'd like to apologize to @bodyman5000 and 1 for that tweet and all the responses.

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

I'd like to apologize to @bodyman5000 and 1 for that tweet and all the responses.

You should read it. You won't.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

You should read it. You won't.

Yes, I read it. Golden escalator ride. Good stuff!

 

[riverman]

I am outraged that you are outraged at my outrage at your outrage.

barfo

You're Sid Vicious?

 

[H.C.]

There are so many bigger things to worry about than an article against or for Trump.
Just like there are so many bigger things to worry about than what Trump tweets next.
People from both sides are taking part of this clown show. While I just sit back and wait for those who are for and against to fight one another.

Well now, if we are going to get to what is wrong with people, and I guess you do. Let's have it straight out.
If you want to back your mouth, this old dude would be pleased to accommodate you and your mouth.
If you're man enough.

Yes, I do believe your post is offensive.

@PtldPlatypus how does this quoted post read to you?
I'm quite curious.
Lots of grey area for sure.

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

There are so many bigger things to worry about than an article against or for Trump.
Just like there are so many bigger things to worry about than what Trump tweets next.
People from both sides are taking part of this clown show. While I just sit back and wait for those who are for and against to fight one another.




@PtldPlatypus how does this quoted post read to you?
I'm quite curious.
Lots of grey area for sure.

You want to know what my issue with this boils down to? Being at war for my entire adult life. That's what is important.

Corporate media keeps this going and I can't even get ONE of them to admit how this is garbage. Not one.

I'm finding that people I agree with more are actually progressives and I don't mean democrats.

Progressives.

Real ones, not the ones who swallow what their corporate media pushes onto them.

Who the fuck ever heard of Pete Buttigieg? (Spelling???)

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

There are so many bigger things to worry about than an article against or for Trump.
Just like there are so many bigger things to worry about than what Trump tweets next.
People from both sides are taking part of this clown show. While I just sit back and wait for those who are for and against to fight one another.




@PtldPlatypus how does this quoted post read to you?
I'm quite curious.
Lots of grey area for sure.

What's grey about it? CC insulted him (Trump supporter) and he challenged him to a fight. Which would be awesome.

I've wanted to see cage fights with internet posters for years.

I'd probably let my sister fight @Chris Craig but I'd want to make sure the ref could keep her from hurting him.

 

[H.C.]

What's grey about it? CC insulted him (Trump supporter) and he challenged him to a fight. Which would be awesome.

I've wanted to see cage fights with internet posters for years.

I'd probably let my sister fight @Chris Craig but I'd want to make sure the ref could keep her from hurting him.

Actually CC didn't insult him per the rules.
If that's an insult than we need some more safe spaces.

Also marazul is great at staying in the grey area of the rules.
It's good to see you took it as a challenge for physical violence tho.

 

[H.C.]

BTW @bodyman5000 and 1
I have a question for you.

Have you ever seen anyone from either side take something seriously when the opposing side has said.
'It's time for you x to denounce x.'

I certainly haven't. In fact when that's happened I've seen more hate created by both sides than progress.
Or it's. 'Why do we have to denounce something obvious?'

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

Actually CC didn't insult him per the rules.
If that's an insult than we need some more safe spaces.

Also marazul is great at staying in the grey area of the rules.
It's good to see you took it as a challenge for physical violence tho.

He insulted him. Not by name obviously. If Marz said anyone who dislikes Trump is yada yada yada...same thing.

I feel that an 80 something??? year old guy can challenge anyone under 50 to a fight and it is ok.

My grandma is 90 and I think she'd take CC.

 

[H.C.]

He insulted him. Not by name obviously. If Marz said anyone who dislikes Trump is yada yada yada...same thing.

I feel that an 80 something??? year old guy can challenge anyone under 50 to a fight and it is ok.

My grandma is 90 and I think she'd take CC.

I'll make sure sly makes a thread where everyone has to post photoid's so we know who can challenge people to violence and who can't.

I agree it is the same thing.
However as per site rules it's not technically an insult by either of them imo.

I just find it funny that marazul raised a huge stink about violence a month or so ago? and then posted that.

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

I'll make sure sly makes a thread where everyone has to post photoid's so we know who can challenge people to violence and who can't.

I agree it is the same thing.
However as per site rules it's not technically an insult by either of them imo.

I just find it funny that marazul raised a huge stink about violence a month or so ago? and then posted that.

Don't even recall the violence you're speaking of but we're all hypocritical in some way or another.

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

I'll make sure sly makes a thread where everyone has to post photoid's so we know who can challenge people to violence and who can't.

I agree it is the same thing.
However as per site rules it's not technically an insult by either of them imo.

I just find it funny that marazul raised a huge stink about violence a month or so ago? and then posted that.

Funny enough when I was in my thirties a great guy I worked with Carlos always pretended to wanna fight me because I was a foot taller and 100 lbs heavier than him. He was in his early 50s. I told him I was too young in comparison and it wasn't fair to whoop him.

A couple of years ago he came back to work where I did and I was in my 40s then and told him I was too old to fight him.

 

[Lanny]

Im confused????

@bodyman5000 and 1 posts an article where the author takes a trump tweet commending one of his followers and turns it into a racist tweet, because he didn't congratulate the number one pick who isn't a mega follower.

Thats like calling someone sexist because they commend the boyscout of the year but not the girl scout of the year.


So you guys give body man rebuttal to his opinion of the article and so he shows you guys how easy it is to twist a headline by taking a quote by @riverman and twisting it into a headline that paints a bad picture??

And you guys are speechless and putting him on ignore for giving an example in here that fits the twisting of the tweet in the article??????



Ohhh mannnn....

No green font needed here......

First of all, I'm not putting him on ignore. So let's get that straight.
Secondly, my response had nothing to do with his link to any article, it had to do with his atrocious remark to Riverman "Riverman wants to sew Muslim man in rotting hog carcasses so he can't go to heaven." I think this is inappropriate even for making a point.

 

[Lanny]

The jews as dogs?

I didn't see the connection to Jews until I saw the star of David which I've already stated was inappropriate. Take away that star and I see no connection to Jews. Well, there is a tiny fraction of what appears to be a skull cap which would also be inappropriate if it really was a skull cap.

 

[EL PRESIDENTE]

I didn't see the connection to Jews until I saw the star of David which I've already stated was inappropriate. Take away that star and I see no connection to Jews. Well, there is a tiny fraction of what appears to be a skull cap which would also be inappropriate if it really was a skull cap.

ITS BENJAMIN NETENYAHU.

Depicted as a dog.

Trump is wearing a yamaka and is blind.

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

First of all, I'm not putting him on ignore. So let's get that straight.
Secondly, my response had nothing to do with his link to any article, it had to do with his atrocious remark to Riverman "Riverman wants to sew Muslim man in rotting hog carcasses so he can't go to heaven." I think this is inappropriate even for making a point.

It was inappropriate for me to quote him?

 

[Lanny]

ITS BENJAMIN NETENYAHU.

Depicted as a dog.

Trump is wearing a yamaka and is blind.

1. Netanyahu is a public figure and not representative of all or even most Jews;

2. The skull cap is really difficult to tell with just the fraction showing. I missed it on first inspection and only later when it was pointed out to me could I vaguely make out the connection;

3. The dog is supposedly a seeing eye dog since the artist appears to be trying to make the point that Netanyahu is doing the seeing for Trump.

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

ITS BENJAMIN NETENYAHU.

Depicted as a dog.

Trump is wearing a yamaka and is blind.

Give it up already. They could have written "f Jews" in that and they would deny it.

 

[Lanny]

Give it up already. They could have written "f Jews" in that and they would deny it.

Who is they? If you mean me then be man enough to say so.
And notice how it doesn't say f Jews. It doesn't say Jews. It does include a star of David which I've declared inappropriate several times which you seem to be deaf to.

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

Who is they? If you mean me then be man enough to say so.
And notice how it doesn't say f Jews. It doesn't say Jews. It does include a star of David which I've declared inappropriate several times which you seem to be deaf to.

You on some extra strong meds tonight?

 

[Lanny]

You on some extra strong meds tonight?

I take about two dozen pills a day but none affect my mood.
Friday, I did have fentanyl but it wore off before they let me leave the hospital.
No, you are encountering my reply side. I didn't start this conversation and I'm not all that keen on continuing it.

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

1. Netanyahu is a public figure and not representative of all or even most Jews;

Lanny defending drawing a Jewish man as a FUCKING DOG because he's a "public figure"

You might actually be old enough to have seen a No Dogs or Jews sign in this country and you're defending this. Holy mother fucking shit.

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

I take about two dozen pills a day but none affect my mood.
Friday, I did have fentanyl but it wore off before they let me leave the hospital.
No, you are encountering my reply side. I didn't start this conversation and I'm not all that keen on continuing it.

I wouldn't want to continue it if I were you.

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

Who is they? If you mean me then be man enough to say so.
And notice how it doesn't say f Jews. It doesn't say Jews. It does include a star of David which I've declared inappropriate several times which you seem to be deaf to.

I actually shouldn't have said they. You were the one defending a cartoon with a Jew made into a dog. Not they. YOU

 

[Lanny]

I wouldn't want to continue it if I were you.

Well, for some odd reason I'm not going to take your advice on medical matters.