SharpeScooterShooter SharpeShooter Joined May 23, 2022 Messages 7,062 Likes 5,785 Points 113 Yesterday at 10:00 PM #31 tlongII said: Dame isn’t a plus defender. Click to expand... And I doubt he is MVP type. But very good nontheless.
tlongII said: Dame isn’t a plus defender. Click to expand... And I doubt he is MVP type. But very good nontheless.
SharpesTriumph Well-Known Member Joined May 4, 2018 Messages 12,741 Likes 11,465 Points 113 Today at 4:23 AM #32 tlongII said: Dame isn’t a plus defender. Click to expand... Post you quoted didn't say he was.
tlongII Legendary Poster Joined Sep 15, 2008 Messages 17,328 Likes 12,047 Points 113 46 minutes ago #33 SharpesTriumph said: Post you quoted didn't say he was. Click to expand... It certainly implies it.
PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff member Global Moderator Moderator Joined Nov 10, 2008 Messages 34,403 Likes 43,877 Points 113 23 minutes ago #34 tlongII said: It certainly implies it. Click to expand... How does a post that specifically says Dame is "not a very good defender" imply that he's a plus defender? Quite obviously, he's saying that Dame would be an MVP-type if he were a plus defender, but that he's actually neither.
tlongII said: It certainly implies it. Click to expand... How does a post that specifically says Dame is "not a very good defender" imply that he's a plus defender? Quite obviously, he's saying that Dame would be an MVP-type if he were a plus defender, but that he's actually neither.
SharpesTriumph Well-Known Member Joined May 4, 2018 Messages 12,741 Likes 11,465 Points 113 20 minutes ago #35 tlongII said: It certainly implies it. Click to expand... It clearly does not. Sorry you weren't able to understand a simple statement.
tlongII said: It certainly implies it. Click to expand... It clearly does not. Sorry you weren't able to understand a simple statement.