Rastapopoulos
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2008
- Messages
- 42,120
- Likes
- 26,475
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think we better prepare ourselves that the team might not do anything because of the sale of the team.Sleepy Joe better wake up.
Either the Magic REALLY hated Anfernee, they see something godlike in Bane, or we actually want to keep Anfernee, because they overpaid.Sleepy Joe better wake up.
Maybe all of the trades that get rid of one of them demand Toumani or Deni. Would you be glad at that trade?Joe hasn’t been proactive/aggressive enough….
It’s probably why we’re stuck with Jerami and probably Anfernee for the remainder of their contracts.
Yeah I can see that. They let Ayton and Ant walk to save money.I think we better prepare ourselves that the team might not do anything because of the sale of the team.
Yeah I can see that. They let Ayton and Ant walk to save money.
YeahThis is not Cronin's fault as much as I would like to blame that fool -- Ant was NEVER going to get that haul of players and picks and the Magic GM is a complete idiot and basically put ALL his cards into the next 2 to 4 years and now he better pray it works or the Magic are FUCKED. This was a robbery by the Memphis GM and he is now the leader in the clubhouse for Exec of the year cause Bane is a good player but sure as hell not worth that package.
Not interested in trading Scootyesterday's rumor mill has us getting Sabonis for Ayton and Scoot in a 3 way deal with Sac and the Hawks....then mentions Deni is targeted hard from Memphis...not sure what sort of deal they offer but I wouldn't trade Deni ....
Well if he does he'll just extend Ant.Sleepy Joe better wake up.
All I know is that I am preparing for a lame duck season.KCP only has a year left. If they let those guys walk without extracting value and waiting another year before allowing Scoot to really get going, it's a fuck up.
They moved Josh Hart for a crappy pick when it was clear they weren't bringing him back just to get something. I can't imagine they won't do the same thing with Ant, if they even want to move him.
He has a better 3pt%, PER (Simons is below league average, better DBPM and actually makes his team better when he’s on the floor…unlike Simons, who is a -1Bane can shoot but that's it. Horrible reach; just comically bad. They can have him.
Oh he’s better but not for the price. He was second rookie team and that will be his highest honor. Toumani has already bested that. Bane will never get an all nba vote for 3 ufrpHe has a better 3pt%, PER (Simons is below league average, better DBPM and actually makes his team better when he’s on the floor…unlike Simons, who is a -1
It's a lot for Bane although the Orlando picks in 26', 28' and 30' are likely not lottery picks. But who knows...a lot can change in 5 years. Even then though I think the Phoenix 26' pick is probably going to be the best out of the bunch.
And here's some more Bane vs Ant data via Dunks & Threes EPM metric (widely considered the best publicly available all in one +/- metric).
Over the last 4 years....
Desmond Bane: 31.2 Estimated Wins (245 games)
Anfernee Simons: 15.4 Estimated Wins (235 games)
Bane is a better player and a much better fit alongside Suggs, Paolo, and Franz.
Bane's a better player for sure. Don't think anyone's disputing that. Of course, they could have gotten Ant for 1 pick, so is he better than Ant and what you get with the other 3 and swap?It's a lot for Bane although the Orlando picks in 26', 28' and 30' are likely not lottery picks. But who knows...a lot can change in 5 years. Even then though I think the Phoenix 26' pick is probably going to be the best out of the bunch.
And here's some more Bane vs Ant data via Dunks & Threes EPM metric (widely considered the best publicly available all in one +/- metric).
Over the last 4 years....
Desmond Bane: 31.2 Estimated Wins (245 games)
Anfernee Simons: 15.4 Estimated Wins (235 games)
Bane is a better player and a much better fit alongside Suggs, Paolo, and Franz.
Yeah - when I looked into EPM, Im really not impressed.Bane's a better player for sure. Don't think anyone's disputing that. Of course, they could have gotten Ant for 1 pick, so is he better than Ant and what you get with the other 3 and swap?
As for EPM, like with a lot of advanced stats, always feels like a lot of noise. When the defensive side of it lists Luka as better than guys like Lu Dort, Nesmith, Bridges, etc., I start to question what the stat is actually showing us.
problem when you look at WS is, of course, guys on winning teams have higher WSs, because they "contributed" to more wins. But yes, lots of saltYeah - when I looked into EPM, Im really not impressed.
Honestly, I think WS/48 does a better job (although not perfect). Still have to take things with a big grain of salt
Oh for sure. There's no perfect stat out there and yes the defensive stuff has some weird stuff going on. Like I'm sure Luka's defensive rebounding numbers are contributing a lot to what we are seeing here, especially when looking at him vs Dort. These stats are always going to struggle to adjust for teammate quality and context as well.Bane's a better player for sure. Don't think anyone's disputing that. Of course, they could have gotten Ant for 1 pick, so is he better than Ant and what you get with the other 3 and swap?
As for EPM, like with a lot of advanced stats, always feels like a lot of noise. When the defensive side of it lists Luka as better than guys like Lu Dort, Nesmith, Bridges, etc., I start to question what the stat is actually showing us.