Batum's Inconsistency

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Guys like Paul George aren't rare

Guys like Batum are

Paul George is an all-star and at times a borderline superstar.

What's rarer

A borderline superstar or role player?

Christ.
 
Also missing: LeBron James, Carmelo Anthony, etc

Assists are the only thing that stand out with his line. As a SF making $11M per year there's no reason why he shouldn't be averaging at least 13pts and 7reb. Big whoop. Kawhi Leonard is at 13/6 in 29 min a game to Batum's 36 minutes per game. He also shoots 52% and is easily the better defender.

Keep posting the obscure filter of stats, though.

Stats be damned, some people won't budge off of their positions.

Anthony and James aren't on the list because Anthony didn't average 5 assists, and James didn't average 7 rebounds.

Also, while Kawhi Leonard had a very good NBA Finals (18/6/2), his overall playoff stats were 14/7/2, meaning he wasn't consistent, either. He had 5 playoff games of over 20 points, and 3 of them happened to be in the NBA Finals. That doesn't seem very consistent to me, considering the Spurs played 22 postseason games. :dunno:

For the season, Leonard went 13/6/2. I suppose saying assists don't matter is one way to try and discredit Batum's season, but when you're asking why Anthony and James aren't on the list with Durant and Batum, you're kind of defeating your own argument. I happen to think Leonard is a very good player, much like Tayshaun Prince. Offensively, he can't come close to comparing to what Nic is doing, though, at this stage of his career.
 
Last edited:
Stats be damned, some people won't budge off of their positions.

Anthony and James aren't on the list because Anthony didn't average 5 assists, and James didn't average 7 rebounds.

Also, while Kawhi Leonard had a very good NBA Finals (18/6/2), his overall playoff stats were 14/7/2, meaning he wasn't consistent, either.

For the season, Leonard went 13/6/2. I suppose saying assists don't matter is one way to try and discredit Batum's season, but when you're asking why Anthony and James aren't on the list with Durant and Batum, you're kind of defeating your own argument.

It's actually making my argument

Who cares what his obscure filtered stat line is when it doesn't prove he's better than other players not on the list

It's nice gimmick to pull, but that's all it is
 
The fact that you can't come up with someone else besides Prince as the base line, or Pippen as the extreme, proves how difficult it is to find players like Batum.

How many scoring wings are there in the league? How many have there been in the last ten years? There are a bunch of guys like Kawhi Leonard. He's not a unique snowflake, no matter how much you want him to be.

Come up with someone else besides Prince? Why would I do that?

I've already said I think Prince is a pretty good comparison for Nic. Am I' required to think of every comparison possible, while you sit there and don't even make one?

Prince and Batum played pretty similar roles with similar numbers, and both are best suited as role players on championship teams.

Kawhi Leonard is better than both.
 
How many scoring wings are there in the league? How many have there been in the last ten years? There are a bunch of guys like Kawhi Leonard. He's not a unique snowflake, no matter how much you want him to be.

Kawhi Leonard isn't just "a scoring wing". He shoots the 3, hits over 50% from the field overall, has a low usage rate, and plays excellent defense. Shawn Marion and Lamar Odom are the only forwards who have ever put up a season comparable to Leonard's combination of those things. Nobody's ever done it before age 25.

http://bkref.com/tiny/KsoS1

It's not hard to cherry pick stats to make a player unique.
 
Come up with someone else besides Prince? Why would I do that?

I've already said I think Prince is a pretty good comparison for Nic. Am I' required to think of every comparison possible, while you sit there and don't even make one?

Prince and Batum played pretty similar roles with similar numbers, and both are best suited as role players on championship teams.

Kawhi Leonard is better than both.

I agree...
 
You may want to take a look at USG% too before you go down the PER road. Just a friendly hint.

TS% has more to do with PER than USG%

image18.png


Friendly hint
 
Kawhi Leonard isn't just "a scoring wing". He shoots the 3, hits over 50% from the field overall, has a low usage rate, and plays excellent defense. Shawn Marion and Lamar Odom are the only forwards who have ever put up a season comparable to Leonard's combination of those things. Nobody's ever done it before age 25.

http://bkref.com/tiny/KsoS1

It's not hard to cherry pick stats to make a player unique.

Boom

Repped!
 
Let's see some player comparisons for Batum since comparing him to Tayshaun Prince is seen as a disgrace on this forum

All welcomed to join in

Batum's a much better offensive version of Prince. Nothing wrong with that, but it seems like you're debating arguments that nobody in this thread is making. Is Batum a star? Of course not, unless you count the French national team, I suppose. I'm excited to see how Nic performs at the FIBAs, because he's basically the lead option on that team w/out Parker playing.
 
It's not hard to cherry pick stats to make a player unique.

QUOTE OF THE DAY

This has been my main point this entire thread. You guys and your filtered stat lines you love to create to make a player look awesome and unique

It just doesn't prove much
 
TS% has more to do with PER than USG%

image18.png


Friendly hint

Yet Nic had a higher TS last year than Prince has ever had (.586 vs. Prince's best of .556 in 2004-05), yet with a much lower USG. The USG is inflating Prince's PER. Again, you're defeating your own argument if you're using PER to strictly measure the players.
 
Let's see some player comparisons for Batum since comparing him to Tayshaun Prince is seen as a disgrace on this forum

All welcomed to join in

For years I've been saying that Nic is the amalgamation of the best parts of Prince, Battier, and Posey.
I think the Prince comparison is apt, but only for the ROLE - Nic is clearly a much better player than Prince ever was.

As to the whole Nic vs Leonard strawman - different roles, teams, and coaches. If you could equalize that then I think there's a very good chance that Nic would be the better player. Leonard has the HUGE benefit of playing for the best coach in the game, on the best team in the league.
 
Yet Nic had a higher TS last year than Prince has ever had (.586 vs. Prince's best of .556 in 2004-05), yet with a much lower USG. The USG is inflating Prince's PER. Again, you're defeating your own argument if you're using PER to strictly measure the players.

What do you think my argument is? That Prince is better than Nic?

I never made that argument in this thread, so I'm not sure what your point is.

I have said that Kawhi Leonard is better than Batum, though.
 
Kawhi Leonard isn't just "a scoring wing". He shoots the 3, hits over 50% from the field overall, has a low usage rate, and plays excellent defense. Shawn Marion and Lamar Odom are the only forwards who have ever put up a season comparable to Leonard's combination of those things. Nobody's ever done it before age 25.

http://bkref.com/tiny/KsoS1

It's not hard to cherry pick stats to make a player unique.

Is anybody saying Leonard isn't a very good player? I assume he was Finals MVP for a reason. He's going to make a lot of money after this season, just like Nic, because he's so versatile. I wonder if Spurs fans will whine if he has a 13/7/5 season?
 
Yet Nic had a higher TS last year than Prince has ever had ...
I might be wrong on this one, but I'm pretty sure Nic has the highest TS% on our team. (Is TS% the same as AFG% and/or EffFG%?)
 
For years I've been saying that Nic is the amalgamation of the best parts of Prince, Battier, and Posey.
I think the Prince comparison is apt, but only for the ROLE - Nic is clearly a much better player than Prince ever was.

As to the whole Nic vs Leonard strawman - different roles, teams, and coaches. If you could equalize that then I think there's a very good chance that Nic would be the better player. Leonard has the HUGE benefit of playing for the best coach in the game, on the best team in the league.

Well I've been hearing how great of a coach Terry Stotts is. Seems like Nic is in a fine situation, so I don't think the Pop angle applies here all that much.

I would agree that Nic is better than Prince, but closer than people here seem to think. Prince was a vital player for those Detroit teams. Very intelligent and played both sides of the floor, and filled the point forward role.

Underrated player.
 
Is anybody saying Leonard isn't a very good player? I assume he was Finals MVP for a reason. He's going to make a lot of money after this season, just like Nic, because he's so versatile. I wonder if Spurs fans will whine if he has a 13/7/5 season?
Nate was basically saying that he's a dime-a-dozen small forward; that Leonard is good, but Batum is special because he's unique. I was just pointing out that Leonard is pretty unique too.
 
QUOTE OF THE DAY

This has been my main point this entire thread. You guys and your filtered stat lines you love to create to make a player look awesome and unique

It just doesn't prove much

I don't see how posting ppg/rpg/apg/spg/bpg is considered "cherry-picking" stats. These are the basics of basketball statistics. I guess a triple-double should be considered irrelevant, since it's a "cherry-picked" statistic.
 
Nate was basically saying that he's a dime-a-dozen small forward; that Leonard is good, but Batum is special because he's unique. I was just pointing out that Leonard is pretty unique too.

Ah, got it. Leonard is a very good role player; one of the best in the NBA. He's like Batum and Lance Stephenson in that regard. Leonard is going to get the chance to be the primary scorer for the Spurs over the next few seasons, so then I'll be better able to assess if he's truly a star player. As it stands now, Batum and Leonard can't be considered stars by me, simply because their teams aren't asking them to fill those roles.
 
I don't see how posting ppg/rpg/apg/spg/bpg is considered "cherry-picking" stats. These are the basics of basketball statistics. I guess a triple-double should be considered irrelevant, since it's a "cherry-picked" statistic.

The point is who cares when there's clearly guys better than him that aren't on the list

So his assists are good for a SF. Good job, good effort.

His pts and rebounds are what you would expect out of a guy making $11M per year

I just don't think the filtered stat line proves all that much.
 
Well I've been hearing how great of a coach Terry Stotts is. Seems like Nic is in a fine situation, so I don't think the Pop angle applies here all that much.
Hahahahahahaha! Yeah, Terry and Pops are equals. Sure thing.

I would agree that Nic is better than Prince, but closer than people here seem to think. Prince was a vital player for those Detroit teams. Very intelligent and played both sides of the floor, and filled the point forward role.

Underrated player.
I agree. Prince was vital to the Pistons championship team. Just as Nic will be to ours. I don't think a Prince comparison is a negative in any way (but it seems like you're trying to make it negative, despite your comments to the contrary). I do think the comp needs to come with the caveat that Nic is definitely a better player, otherwise people will think your saying Nic is only AS GOOD as Prince. The comparison only works on the level of what they provide to their teams (ie, role), not on the level of individual talent and ability.
 
Natebishop's line saying Batum is a rarer player than Paul George is the worst line of the thread

Like you honestly don't believe Paul George could take a lesser role, average fewer shots, be more of a facilitator and average at least 5apg?

Come on.

The great players in the NBA could do exactly what Batum is doing right now if they wanted to take a lesser role.

Instead they're too busy leading their teams.
 
Tayshaun Prince made $11m in 2010-11.

His stats?

14/4/3 with a 15 PER on 21 USG. TS% of .511. I'd love to seen the Piston board's version of RoyToy during the seasons Prince was making ~$10m/year.
 
Natebishop's line saying Batum is a rarer player than Paul George is the worst line of the thread

Like you honestly don't believe Paul George could take a less role, average fewer shots, be more of a facilitator and average at least 5apg?

Come on.

The great players in the NBA could do exactly what Batum is doing right now if they wanted to take a lesser role.

Instead they're too busy leading their teams.

They're also making max money. Batum's production for $11m is right in line for what he gives the team. I think he's a bargain at this point, actually, and wonder how much it's going to cost the Blazers to re-sign him.
 
Fun thread, though. I finally get where RoyToy's coming from, and although I don't necessarily agree with his opinion on Batum's game, I can agree that Nic is a role player. As I posted earlier, it will be interesting to see what he does at the FIBAs as a primary option on offense.
 
Hahahahahahaha! Yeah, Terry and Pops are equals. Sure thing.

No one said that. Bad line from you


I agree. Prince was vital to the Pistons championship team. Just as Nic will be to ours. I don't think a Prince comparison is a negative in any way (but it seems like you're trying to make it negative, despite your comments to the contrary). I do think the comp needs to come with the caveat that Nic is definitely a better player, otherwise people will think your saying Nic is only AS GOOD as Prince. The comparison only works on the level of what they provide to their teams (ie, role), not on the level of individual talent and ability.

I've said that they're comparable players and that Nic is better.

As of right now I don't really think it's a huge gap, no, and that's not because of what I think of Batum.

Prince was just a damn good player. People have said there's no comparison offensively, but I don't necessarily agree with that. I think Prince had some abilities that Batum doesn't or aren't on the same level (ball handling, post game, isolation). I think Prince is better in those areas.
 
They're also making max money. Batum's production for $11m is right in line for what he gives the team. I think he's a bargain at this point, actually, and wonder how much it's going to cost the Blazers to re-sign him.

I don't agree it's a bargain

It's more market value and about where he should be. I get that someone might say Parsons is making $15M so $11M is a bargain, but Parsons was overpaid.
 
Wait, after reading this thread I've learned the following...

1. Every stat posted by anyone other than RoyToy is pure junk. Only the stats posted by RoyToy mean anything.

2. Batum sucks because he is not as good as Lebron, Durant, Carmello or Leonard.

3. Mags seems to get his Leonards confused.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top