illmatic99
formerly yuyuza1
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 57,763
- Likes
- 56,275
- Points
- 113
Isn't there a rule about how players can't skip the game if they're healthy enough to play?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, no shit... much better suited to the AS game, too. Well, every year there's one head scratcher each from the fans and the coaches. Could come down to lots of votes being split, with some coaches voting with strict positions in mind, they also can't vote for their own players, so that puts the unanimously deserving players at a disadvantage (-1 vote).oddest snub is horford over josh smith. don't understand that at all given smith has seniority and a much higher PER.
Needed more for him than just Frye and Fernandez, i think?
We have players who can make up for that. Its not like he's getting dominated by his man night in/night out.
You seem to ignore the facts. Aldridge's defensive rebound% is 19.8 (easily a career high). Randolph's is 21.7 (3rd best in his career). So, actually he's a better defensive rebounder than Lamarcus Aldridge, who doesn't bother to rebound on either end of the court.
And his alleged 'bad defense' is probably the most overhyped non-thing in the league. He's certainly not great, or even good...but his defensive rating is just a hair below Aldridge's defensive rating. And not that blocks is a sign of overall defensive ability, but how on EARTH can it be that Zach and Lamarcus are averaging the SAME number of blocks per game this season? Both have 20 blocks in 44 games. That's just so ridiculously hard to believe. Zach is 2 inches shorter and can't jump over a phone book. I'd say that both are roughly average defensively.
I've always liked Zach as a player. He gets more out of less physical ability than probably anyone in the league. Clearly he's worked hard to get where he's at. I wish Aldridge would work that hard, he might be an all star too.
Don't miss Randolph one iota. He's been given away for free 3 times in 2 years for a reason.
Yes. The reason is that the Knicks and Clippers are bad teams that make bad decisions. The Grizzlies, led by Zach, though, are 24-11 since waiving Iverson. Meanwhile, the Blazers could desperately use a player like Zach.
With Randolph being one of those bad decisions.
The Blazers could use a healthy roster. With everyone healthy, Randolph wouldn't be needed at all, just like last year. He'd get in the way and take too many bad shots. That's been him his whole career.
Sorry, don't miss him one bit, and neither do the other teams that traded him.
The Grizzlies are winning because they have a great starting 5
He's had a good year on a good team(finally!)
He's always been able to put up big numbers
Yup, still don't miss him one bit.
we should have just kept him AND miles, they would both be huge expirings next year, not to mention zbo would be a welcome addition in the frontcourt right now.
Yes. The reason is that the Knicks and Clippers are bad teams that make bad decisions. The Grizzlies, led by Zach, though, are 24-11 since waiving Iverson. Meanwhile, the Blazers could desperately use a player like Zach.
I think Horford got picked, cause they needed a backup Center. Kinda like back when Magloire made the team, cause there was nobody else to pick!
2. Zach is a big part of their success, but I don't know if I'd say he's leading Mayo, Gay, Gasol and crew. Then again I don't necessarily know their team dynamics.
.

