CIA: Russia influenced the election

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

I have an I5. its not modern enough?
when you uploaded it to S2, the site software reduced your image resolution so it doesn't take people forever to download the image.

Plus, a 4K image would be the full size of your screen if you have a 4K display. And as with 4K, incredibly detailed.
 
I had a used door that I checked over and it looked perfect. The paint shop said it had a scratch in it. I had a picture of when I fit the door.

Not believing that they didn't scratch it I went back and zoomed in and sure as shit, scratch. I can't even upload it because it is too big.

I had to text it to myself to reduce the size, scratch is about two inches in front and six inches below silver door handleView attachment 11832

I stil dont see it. Or barely see it. definitely not clear.

Kinda validating my point that the doc would be pretty hard to read at the angle she would have taken the pic from regardless of zoomability, no?
 
when you uploaded it to S2, the site software reduced your image resolution so it doesn't take people forever to download the image.

Plus, a 4K image would be the full size of your screen if you have a 4K display. And as with 4K, incredibly detailed.

But I am referring to looking at it on my [-hone prior to uploading to S2. I zoom in all the way and still cant read the doc. It is full size on my screen when I tilt the phone on its side.
 
I stil dont see it. Or barely see it. definitely not clear.

Kinda validating my point that the doc would be pretty hard to read at the angle she would have taken the pic from regardless of zoomability, no?
On my phone it is as plain as day. The original is wayyyyy too big of a file to upload. I texted it to myself and saved it. My phone decreased the size of the file to make it textable.
 
Just took this picture of a bunch of coolant from 4 or 5 feet away, no zoom. On my phone I can read the text. Again, this is after texting it to myself
image000000_03.jpg
 
Just took this picture of a bunch of coolant from 4 or 5 feet away, no zoom. On my phone I can read the text. Again, this is after texting it to myself
View attachment 11835
NV-OSHA must be far more relaxed than OR_OSHA. Up here they'd be running around with their hair on fire and levying fines for no chemical containment. And yes, I know it's only antifreeze......
 
NV-OSHA must be far more relaxed than OR_OSHA. Up here they'd be running around with their hair on fire and levying fines for no chemical containment. And yes, I know it's only antifreeze......
Not a fine here. We have containment for everything required by law, grounded cabinets for the paint shop and recycling containers kept in a leak proof container for oil and antifreeze.
 
I didnt see her scan the roiom. I saw her look to one side for a moment, but the room is emptying. lots of activity and lots of things that can catch the eye. Furthermore, d oyou see the angle of the camera vs the doc on the table? You really think someone is goign to be ableto read the doc from a picture taken at that angle?

Here is a pic I just took attempting to get the same angle on a manual. Can you read it?
View attachment 11831

That was probably closer to this than she was to hers and when I grab the pic on my phone to expand as large as possible, I can still only read the headline. I am just saying if she was taking pics of the doc for actual info, she would more than likely need a much better picture than the one she was taking IF she was taking one.

Just curious...what brand is that fan? American-made Patton, or a Chinese knockoff?
 
Hawaii Breeze....Made in China.....used in the USA.
LOL

eeww!

If it's one thing I hate, it's Chinese-made fans. I have an "American-assembled" Air King model 9214, and it's one of the best things I've ever bought. Costs a small fortune ($80 or $90, IIRC), but well worth it.

So far, I haven't been able to find out if the motor was made in China. But it's ball-bearing, and smooth as butter. Quiet and powerful as well.
 
You're fucking shitting me:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/rt-interrupts-cspan-online-feed

this-is-not-fine-001-dae9d5.png
 
Got a new whinnnner^^^^^^

Whiner/winner.

Yep, this is the first contact like in an alien movie before Russia takes over. This is worse than the birthers.
 
Comey helped Trump win. If he'd put her on trial like he should have, Sanders would be president now.
 
Comey helped Trump win. If he'd put her on trial like he should have, Sanders would be president now.
If we properly vetted candidates before they could waste our time and money we might have had a deeper field, this was the weakest field I can remember. It should be much more difficult to qualify to run for president. That all this baggage even exists throughout an election is the tragedy and failure of the system
 
If we properly vetted candidates before they could waste our time and money we might have had a deeper field, this was the weakest field I can remember. It should be much more difficult to qualify to run for president. That all this baggage even exists throughout an election is the tragedy and failure of the system
Who is going to vet these candidates?

How about I do it?

If you think not, then nobody should have that kind of power.
 
Who is going to vet these candidates?

How about I do it?

If you think not, then nobody should have that kind of power.
let's say the email scandal of Clinton should have been transparent and cleared long before she could be a presidential candidate...Trump's baggage, whatever conflicts of interest if there are any shouldn't be an issue after an election..all should be cleared up before the campaign begins and campaigning then should stick to policy matters, not slander and ghosts in the closet....if we've evolved into the modern civil nation we claim to be at least....so far, it's been disappointing
 
Perhaps the swamp need draining more than we know
I'd never dispute that..other than I think most of us know....what I question is the Trump masquerade ball of character he's trying to sell....I haven't bid on that yet
 
let's say the email scandal of Clinton should have been transparent and cleared long before she could be a presidential candidate...Trump's baggage, whatever conflicts of interest if there are any shouldn't be an issue after an election..all should be cleared up before the campaign begins and campaigning then should stick to policy matters, not slander and ghosts in the closet....if we've evolved into the modern civil nation we claim to be at least....so far, it's been disappointing

The vetting process is 2 years of campaign and the dirty tricks by the opposition.

If there's dirt, they'll find it.

It's only tough if the person is in government - they have the power and powerful friends (and assistants) who can cover things up.
 
I still think a year and a half campaign is ridiculous...couple months..vote...move on. Most of the spin is out of boredom and burnout. By the time they take office, they're already punch drunk
 
I still think a year and a half campaign is ridiculous...couple months..vote...move on. Most of the spin is out of boredom and burnout. By the time they take office, they're already punch drunk
We do want the best government money can buy, no?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top