Blazers1977
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2019
- Messages
- 552
- Likes
- 288
- Points
- 63
You mean when he gets "well built" like Zach Collins ? Then he'll be free of injuries?
strength conditioning can lower your chances of injury, yes
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You mean when he gets "well built" like Zach Collins ? Then he'll be free of injuries?
He's 20, not 19.It’s interesting how the two most popular opinions on this forum seem to be:
(1) we need to take advantage of Prime Lillard
and (2) we need to develop this 19 year old!
these are basically mutually exclusive goals...By the time Ant is in his prime Dame will be far past his.
Our best option is to trade Ant for someone like Love and keep CJ, and that is the most likely scenario. Sucks bc Ant really does seem like he has superstar potential... but the only other option is sacrificing Lillard’s prime years.
100% disagree. You can have meaningful minutes from solid young players and win championships. They are not mutually exclusive at all.It’s interesting how the two most popular opinions on this forum seem to be:
(1) we need to take advantage of Prime Lillard
and (2) we need to develop this 19 year old!
these are basically mutually exclusive goals...By the time Ant is in his prime Dame will be far past his.
Our best option is to trade Ant for someone like Love and keep CJ, and that is the most likely scenario. Sucks bc Ant really does seem like he has superstar potential... but the only other option is sacrificing Lillard’s prime years.
He's 20, not 19.
The 20 year old is already helping us win. So playing him doesnt sacrifice anything.
Oh yes they do, for example, last year at that time, Rockets fans on the clutch forum wanted to go full rebuild and trade everyone (including Harden)It’s a simple fact that other fan bases do not panic or complain nearly as much as Portland fans (the onto places worse are probably NY and Dallas). When Pop rests his stars and has a mediocre regular season, the entire city doesn’t call for his head. The ownership obviously takes the fans opinion into account, they are the ones making the owners money. You’re basically just victim blaming.
Seriously? You can say that about almost the entire team. CJ made some shots but he also failed to grab a rebound and made a nice pass to Huerter.
What happens to veterans who play shit defense and stay in the game? Is that good for them?
It’s interesting how the two most popular opinions on this forum seem to be:
(1) we need to take advantage of Prime Lillard
and (2) we need to develop this 19 year old!
these are basically mutually exclusive goals...By the time Ant is in his prime Dame will be far past his.
Our best option is to trade Ant for someone like Love and keep CJ, and that is the most likely scenario. Sucks bc Ant really does seem like he has superstar potential... but the only other option is sacrificing Lillard’s prime years.
100% disagree. You can have meaningful minutes from solid young players and win championships. They are not mutually exclusive at all.
We can get those guys without trading Simons.meant to edit to 20
It is a sacrifice. We could get someone who is better than he is now (Kevin Love, Blake Griffin) if we trade him. Otherwise lillard is playing with a worse roster than he has to.
The Blazers would never make that trade.It’s not impossible to win with a young player as your 3rd option, but it’s much easier to win with a veteran like Blake Griffin as your third option (and Pistons would likely make that trade).
We can get those guys without trading Simons.
I get what you are saying, but one other note: in the current NBA, you almost have to have a couple of A list vets like Dame and then great production from young 3rd or 4th year players to win championships. It's about money. You need a couple of guys who are still on early rookie type contracts playing beyond their cap hit. Dame and Ant line up fine. When Dame is still in his prime to late prime, Ant will be firing on all cylinders and not be costing the team 20m per. It's actually perfect. CJ is more likely to be traded in my opinion.It’s not impossible to win with a young player as your 3rd option, but it’s much easier to win with a veteran like Blake Griffin as your third option (and Pistons would likely make that trade).
I get what you are saying, but one other note: in the current NBA, you almost have to have a couple of A list vets like Dame and then great production from young 3rd or 4th year players to win championships. It's about money. You need a couple of guys who are still on early rookie type contracts playing beyond their cap hit. Dame and Ant line up fine. When Dame is still in his prime to late prime, Ant will be firing on all cylinders and not be costing the team 20m per. It's actually perfect. CJ is more likely to be traded in my opinion.
With Ant's emergence, I could see CJ flipped for a forward, which is a much more needed position. Think someone of CJ's quality but at the 3/4 or 4/5. I'm not sure CJ's extension actually hurts his trade value though. If a team likes him and needs a lead guard, they might even like the fact that he is under contract for a few years, rather thisn risk trading for someone who might walk as a free agent quickly. These are all just random thoughts though. I certainly don't know everything. Hahagood point. I didn’t consider the salary stuff.
but I don’t think it’s likely we trade CJ after giving him an extension, unless that’s another financial thing that I don’t understand
Sinons doesn't need to be in his prime to help Dame. Nurk was only 22 when he was traded here and hasn't yet hit his prime yet. Should we trade him too?youre probably right. The point I’m making though is that Simons is not going to be in his prime for another 7 years or so. We can either keep him around and wait for him to develop, or we can trade him for someone who is more talented now.
even if we make a trade for Griffin and don’t give away Simons, it doesn’t change the fact that we still have this young kid as a bargaining chip that we can easily use to trade for a player who is ready for a playoff run today, and not in 7 years. I don’t doubt Ant can play at a B+ level in the playoffs right now, but we can easily get someone who can play at an A level in the playoffs with years of playoff experience if we trade him - and that helps Lillard win.
If Stotts is making a single coaching or rotational decision based on fans panicking then he should be fired immediately.
Fun Fact:
Simons is averaging 50-40-78 after 10 games.
It’s interesting how the two most popular opinions on this forum seem to be:
(1) we need to take advantage of Prime Lillard
and (2) we need to develop this 19 year old!
these are basically mutually exclusive goals...By the time Ant is in his prime Dame will be far past his.
Our best option is to trade Ant for someone like Love and keep CJ, and that is the most likely scenario. Sucks bc Ant really does seem like he has superstar potential... but the only other option is sacrificing Lillard’s prime years.
It’s not impossible to win with a young player as your 3rd option, but it’s much easier to win with a veteran like Blake Griffin as your third option (and Pistons would likely make that trade).
You trade CJ for Blake... Not ant.
CJ can't be traded for almost 3 more months.......Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaah.
Aaahhahhhhahahahahahahhaahahah.
Trade CJ. He gets us a win now player.
Sorry, but its the truth. Now, since your argument is done...
Money. Defense. Athleticism. Fit. Long-term potential. Trade value.why would we trade our most consistent playoff performer over the last 7 playoff series, instead of a 20 year old who has played less than 10 total games in the NBA?
CJ can't be traded for almost 3 more months.......

Money. Defense. Athleticism. Fit. Long-term potential. Trade value.
Blake looked so gimpy last night -- put up numbers but it just seemed like he was laboring so much. I'm sure rust had something to do with it. But I don't want that injury risk if it costs CJ.You trade CJ for Blake... Not ant.
Money. Defense. Athleticism. Fit. Long-term potential. Trade value.
