That’s the problem with most of the “major” theoretical targets..they all have issues. Porter hasn’t been healthy in two years, Love isn’t durable and is owed a billion dollars. The one that makes the most sense is Aldridge, but idk about the Spurs willingness to go into a rebuild while Pop is still around.
I think the best strategy would be to target complimentary players, Covington being the prime one.
When trading for players with "issues", it's a good thing IF they end up panning out. Why?
It simply takes a lot less to go out and get that player. It'd take less to go out and get Otto Porter than if he'd been healthy all along. So if we go get him and then he ends up being healthy for us, the reward is the same and we got him at a discount.
At some point, Portland will likely have to take a risk on someone, I just don't think the reward from someone like Love is enough for us to lock ourselves into that roster, because that's what his contract would do. At this point, Griffin is probably too risky as well, but if Detroit simply wanted off his contract and we traded Whiteside for him then Griffin got healthy and regained form (big IF)? Then that provides the most reward possible.
That's the thing though, I don't really like the reward for most players out there right now, which is why I want to somehow increase our flexibility going into the off-season and next year, so that we can push off that decision and retain enough assets to pounce when the time is right.
It's also why Porter is my #1 target. Perfect fit, likely available at a discount, and if he's still hurt then he's a $27M expiring this off-season and next year, so he'd help our flexibility regardless (therefore, he's a no risk, decent reward option).
I also think Porter could be better for us than RoCo. He's not quite the defender RoCo is but Porter is still a good one, and he provides much more on the offensive end (3pt shooting, better playmaking and ball handling for a forward), and he can probably be had for less.
RoCo is definitely option #2, but I think Minnesota is asking for too much and won't settle for anything less than their current asking price.