Good question - I can't imagine how that would work - people should only have a single vote in any given election. Ideally all candidates would be on a single ballot regardless of party affiliation but I think that's pretty much a pipe dream, at least in my lifetime.
That's not what I said. That has no bearing on my position at all.
If our leaders are being funded by the fossil fuel industry they are going to side with the fossil fuel industry over us. If emissions standards or carbon capture does prevent a bit of greenhouse emissions but replaces or leads to the delay of other policy that would eliminate or drastically reduce overall fossil fuel usage sooner then it is a net negative.
Problem with hydrogen is that it's an incredibly inefficient process to make it (losing 30% of the energy) and store it (losing another 10%) then you lose like 1% of it's mass per day in storage (in incredibly expensive tanks). And after all of that you run it through an internal combustion engine in which you lose another 50% of what energy you do have left.
And I'll agree that hydrogen could well have a place in our energy grid. I just don't know how it would work. If we could come up with a way to store it, then outlaw making it from natural gas... Or maybe just get the environmental impact tax and dividend going... Then it would have a chance of being used for good.
I don't wear lipstick.
I didn't realize we have so much in common!
Yeah, and Democreeps hate Repubic-hairs. See how that sophomoric rhetoric works? Keep on living in your echo chamber......
This just looks like a link to Republicans complaining... I don't see evidence of anything.
Even in Joes younger years he always made outlandish remarks to the point of having a reputation of being an idiot....
I would mostly agree, except that Biden has a much more professional and qualified cabinet. And I'd rather they were greeting my costumers than the MAGA turds that Trump brings around, if I were Walmart.
